Scientific peer reviews are essential for insuring the quality of scholarly journals. Peer reviewers who have the relevant expertise to comment on the article’s suitability for publication in the CJST may address issues not just on the quality of the study itself, but also of its relevance and interest to the journal’s particular readership. The reviewers’ in depth evaluation will play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication and usually responding to editors in fairly short deadline. At the same time, on behalf of the CJST membership, we are very grateful for the time and effort the reviewers invest in the review process.
